|
Handbook for Selecting
Coaches for the GCRA Competitive Ringette Program - Amended by a motion
of the GCRA Executive June 18, 2005
A HANDBOOK
FOR SELECTING COACHES
FOR THE GLOUCESTER-CUMBERLAND
COMPETITIVE
RINGETTE PROGRAM
| |
APPROVED BY GRA: |
APRIL 2, 1997 |
| |
AMENDED by GRA: |
MAY 6, 1998 |
| |
AMENDED by GCRA: |
JUNE 18, 2005 |
INDEX
| |
1.0 |
DEFINITIONS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1.1 |
Coach's Historical File |
3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1.2 |
Year 200X Coaching Selection
File |
3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1.3 |
Applicant |
3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1.4 |
Senior AA Ringette
team |
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
2.0 |
MANDATE OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE |
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
3.0 |
SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS |
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
4.0 |
THE SELECTION PROCESS |
5
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
4.1 |
Overview of the Process |
5
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
4.2 |
Factors assessed by GCRA |
6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
4.3 |
Factors assessed by the Coaching
Selection Committee |
7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
4.4 |
Weight of Information Sources |
8
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
5.0 |
GENERAL GUIDELINES |
8
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This handbook was prepared
with input from various sources: Gloucester-Cumberland Ringette
coaches, Gloucester-Cumberland Ringette parents, coaches from
other sports and Ringette coaches from another association.
The Gloucester-Cumberland Ringette Association subsequently
revised the handbook. The handbook should be reviewed on an
annual basis to provide the best guideline possible to the Coaches
Selection Committee.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 1.0 |
DEFINITIONS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1.1 |
|
COACH'S HISTORICAL FILE |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
To ensure historical information
is available for use by the Selection Committee and GCRA during
the coaching selection process, a "COACH'S HISTORICAL FILE"
is created for each competitive coach/assistant coach in Gloucester-Cumberland.
This file should contain the following: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ø |
Prior years coach's evaluations, |
|
| |
Ø |
Prior years interview responses, |
|
| |
Ø |
Correspondence generated by or
on behalf of the coach, |
|
| |
Ø |
Minutes of GCRA/Special meetings
when issues regarding this coach were addressed, |
| |
Ø |
Any other relevant data. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
To ensure confidentiality and
that information is made available on a need to know basis: |
| |
|
| |
Ø |
The Secretary or VP Competitive
of GCRA holds responsibility for extracting and filing documentation
in the Coach's Historical File. |
| |
Ø |
The Selection Committee, via
the VP Competitive, will receive prior years evaluations (if available)
for use during the selection process. |
| |
Ø |
GCRA reviews all information
available to determine whether the coach meets GCRA's criteria. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Once the process is complete,
all information/documents are returned to the Coach's Historical
File. Documentation is retained for 3 years. However, if the candidate's
relationship with GCRA has previously been deemed to be unacceptable
according to 4.2(a) then all information and documentation will
be maintained in the Historical File until instructed otherwise
by the GCRA Executive. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1.2 |
|
YEAR 200X COACHING SELECTION
FILE |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
To ensure consistency as well
as a certain degree of variation (i.e. questions) from year to
year, documentation generated during the selection process is
filed in a file called "200X COACHING SELECTION FILE "(i.e.:
2003/04 Coaching Selection File). A new file is created yearly
and it contains: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ø |
Questions and answers used, |
| |
Ø |
Grids / Factors and their weight, |
| |
Ø |
Ranking, |
| |
Ø |
Individual Committee member notes. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The Secretary or VP Competitive
of GCRA holds responsibility for creating and extracting the yearly
file. The information is confidential. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1.3 |
|
APPLICANT |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
An applicant is an individual
who wishes to assume the role of head coach, is prepared to complete
his/her responsibilities in the best interest of the players,
the association and the sport of ringette and submits a completed
coaching application to the GCRA. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1.4 |
|
SENIOR AA RINGETTE TEAM |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Any team that could potentially
progress to the National level (i.e. Junior AA, Belle AA, Open
AA) or to the Eastern Canadian Championships (Tween AA). |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2.0 |
MANDATE OF THE SELECTION
COMMITTEE |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
To recommend to the GCRA Executive
the selection of next season's coaches for the Gloucester-Cumberland
Ringette Competitive teams as outlined in the handbook for selecting
coaches by reviewing all applications received, weighting all
information sources, conducting candidate interviews and conveying
results to the GCRA Executive. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 3.0 |
SELECTION COMMITTEE
MEMBERS |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The Selection Committee consists
of 4 members and the current VP Competitive. The VP Competitive
acts as Chairperson and votes in the event of tie situations.
The Coaching Selection Committee should consist of: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1. |
An experienced ringette head/assistant
coach, |
| |
2. |
A knowledgeable ringette parent, |
| |
3. |
Someone from outside (another
sport, another association, etc.), |
| |
4. |
A 4th person not related and
who is 1 or 2 or 3 above. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
All members selected to be a
part of the Selection Committee have an equal voice in the process. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The members of the Coaching Selection
Committee are subject to the approval of the GCRA Executive. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Members of the Coaching Selection
Committee should: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1. |
Not have a direct relationship
with the applicants; |
| |
2. |
Declare themselves in conflict
of interest if they hold opinions or have had past experiences
with the applicant that makes it impossible for them to maintain
objectivity regarding that applicant, or would give the obvious
appearance of bias in their consideration of that applicant. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
On most occasions at least some
Committee members will have an acquaintance with the applicant.
From time to time Committee members may be uncertain whether a
previous relationship or knowledge of an applicant constitutes
a conflict of interest. Members are therefore obliged to discuss
such situations with their peer Committee members, the VP Competitive,
or GCRA Executive when attempting to decide whether a conflict
or the perception of conflict of interest exists. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 4.0 |
THE SELECTION PROCESS¹ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
4.1 |
|
OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| TASK |
Complete By
|
| |
|
|
| 1. |
Coach forwards his/her
application to the current VP Competitive. |
May 31
|
| 2. |
The VP Competitive prepares
a list of proposed Coaching Selection Committee members with references
and submits it to the GCRA Executive for approval. |
Mid May
|
| 3. |
The VP Competitive prepares
a list of coaching applicants and submits it to the GCRA Executive
for approval. |
May 31
|
| 4. |
The current VP Competitive,
in conjunction with the past VP Competitive (in years of transition),
reviews the prior years Coaching Selection Files and develops
new interview questions and answers. |
May 31
|
| 5. |
The current VP Competitive
and the Selection Committee Members review and finalize the questions
and establish the rating mechanism for each of the evaluation
criteria. Refer to 4.3 and 4.4 for selection criteria, the weight
assigned to each and the evaluation tool. |
May 31
|
| 6. |
GCRA Executive reviews
the lists. Using the Coach's Historical File, applicants not meeting
GCRA's mandatory criteria (see 4.2 a) or the basic screening criteria
for senior AA coaches (see 4.2 b) are rejected. VP Competitive
advises the coaching applicant. For those applicants meeting GCRA
criteria, the coach's prior years evaluations and interview responses
are provided to the VP Competitive for use during the selection
process. Prior years Coaching Selection Files are also provided
to the VP Competitive. Refer to 1.1 and 1.2 for details of these
files. |
1st Week of June
|
| 7. |
The VP Competitive sets
up the interviews. |
1st Week of June
|
| 8. |
Candidates are interviewed
and scored using the rating mechanisms. For the purposes of coach
accountability and in the interests of fairness in rating applicants,
only one person can be considered for the position of head coach
for a competitive team. Consequently, only the attributes, experience
and interview responses from one person will be used in the rating.
Applicants are ranked based on the results of applying the factors
and weighting as established. Teams are first recommended to the
coach with the highest ranking (i.e.: the top coach gets the level
requested). When not getting the level requested, a coach is recommended
for a team based on his/her second or third choices and other
evaluation factors. Refer to 4.3 for guidelines on evaluation
factors. |
Early to Mid-June
|
| 9. |
The VP Competitive submits
the list of recommended candidates and respective levels to the
GCRA Executive for approval. Once approval is received, the VP
Competitive will advise the coaches. |
Late June
|
| 10. |
Documentation is retained
by the VP Competitive pending GCRA's approval and then is filed
as indicated in 1.1 and 1.2. |
At end of the
process
|
| _________________________ |
| |
¹To
ensure availability of the Committee members and the coaches,
it is recommended that the process take place before July 1st,
when the vacation season begins. |
| |
4.2 |
|
FACTORS ASSESSED BY GCRA |
| |
|
|
| |
(a) |
Mandatory Criteria |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Normally all applications are
accepted by the GCRA Executive for consideration by the Selection
Committee. However, there are situations when the GCRA Executive
may decide to reject an application. The following are guidelines
on the factors evaluated by the GCRA Executive for refusal of
an applicant |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ø |
The candidate's relationship
with GCRA: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1. |
An absence of mutual respect
between the coach and GCRA, |
| |
|
2. |
Situations where
no remedial action to GCRA's recommendation is undertaken, |
| |
|
3. |
Unresolved or continuing problem
where issues remain unresolved. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ø |
Player and/or parent correspondence
or feedback (outside of evaluations) received directly by the
GCRA Executive deemed to be of a nature as to warrant refusal
of an applicant. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ø |
Unable to meet the coaching requirements
by the imposed deadline (ORA). |
| |
|
|
|
| |
To ensure impartiality and just
cause for rejecting a coach, the following do not enter into the
evaluation: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
1. |
|
Personal opinions regarding a
coach's coaching techniques, |
| |
2. |
|
Personal conflict
with a coach, |
| |
3. |
|
Correspondence and interaction
by the coach with the Executive to address legitimate requests. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
GCRA will communicate the rejection
of an application to the coaching applicant at the time of decision. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
(b) |
Basic Screening Criteria For
Senior AA Coaches |
| |
|
|
|
| |
The candidate must meet the following: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
1. |
|
The applicant should possess
two years acceptable experience on the coaching staff of a sports
team, including the requirement at 2 below. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2. |
|
The applicant should possess
a minimum of one year's acceptable experience as the head coach
of an A or B level ringette team, or of Petite AA ringette team² |
| |
|
|
|
| _________________________ |
| |
²At
the discretion of GCRA Executive an exception to this criterion
may be granted if |
| |
|
|
the non-ringette experience
of a particular applicant is so extensive and compelling to warrant
such an exception or |
| |
|
|
the applicant has extensive
competitive ringette playing experience combined with some experience
as a bench staff member as to warrant an exception to this criterion. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 4.3 |
FACTORS ASSESSED
BY THE COACHING SELECTION COMMITTEE |
| |
|
|
|
| Guideline on factors assessed
by the Selection Committee and the weight assigned to each. |
| |
|
FACTOR
|
EVALUATED
|
WEIGHT
ASSIGNED
|
TIE
BREAKER
|
INFORMATION
SOURCES
(SECTION OF
THIS POLICY)
|
| Coaching Credentials -
Ringette |
YES
|
High
|
|
4
|
| Parent/Player Feedback |
YES
|
High
|
|
1,2
|
| Communication Skills - Verbal
|
YES
|
High
|
|
3
|
| Experience as a Competitive Ringette
Player |
YES
|
High
|
|
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Number of Years at Level |
YES
|
YES
|
|
Medium
|
| Past Successes in Ringette |
YES
|
Medium
|
|
4
|
| Communications Skills - Written |
YES
|
Medium
|
|
4
|
| Knowledge of the Sport |
YES
|
Medium
|
|
1,2,3,4
|
| Age of Coach versus Age of Players |
YES
|
Medium
|
|
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Coaching Credentials - Other |
YES
|
Low
|
|
4
|
| Experience as a Player (Sports
in General) |
YES
|
Low
|
|
1,3,4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Number of Years with same Players |
YES
|
High Negative
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Gloucester - Cumberland Resident |
NO
|
N/A
|
YES
|
5
|
| Daughter on Team |
NO
|
N/A
|
YES
|
5
|
| Gender |
NO
|
N/A
|
YES
|
5
|
| 4.4 |
WEIGHT OF INFORMATION SOURCES |
|
INFORMATION SOURCE
|
Weight Range Assigned in
%
|
| 1. Historical File (Prior
evaluations/interview responses) |
20 - 30
|
| 2. Last coach's evaluation
(most recent) |
30 - 35
|
| 3. Performance during interview |
25 - 30
|
| 4. Information on coaching
application |
10 - 20
|
| 5.0 |
GENERAL GUIDELINES |
| |
|
|
| |
To ensure that the selection
process is fair to all parties involved, and to maintain a level
of professionalism and integrity during the process, the following
guidelines are recommended. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
1. |
Documentation will be retained
for verification, justification and reference purposes. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
A) |
Coach's Historical
File |
| |
|
B) |
200X/XX Coaching Selection File |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2. |
Confidentiality is maintained. |
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
GCRA reviews and rejects those
candidates based on criteria and information available to the
GCRA Executive. Notification to the applicant is at the time of
decision. Refer to 4.2 for suggested GCRA evaluation criteria. |
| |
|
|
| |
4. |
The Selection Committee establishes
the weighting to be used for each element in the process prior
to the start of the selection process and based on the weighting
and ranges outlined in 4.3 and 4.4 |
| |
|
|
| |
5. |
The relative weighting of H /
M / L to each factor assessed by the Committee and how it is applied,
is determined by the Selection Committee (i.e.: H=5, M=3, L=1). |
| |
|
|
| |
6. |
Recommended answers to the interview
questions are formulated prior to the interviews. This is to ensure
the Committee members know what they are looking for and the mandatory
elements of an answer are marked accordingly. |
| |
|
|
| |
7. |
Members of the Selection Committee
have access to the coach's evaluations after the interview to
ensure no bias in marking the candidate's responses. These are
weighted as per the pre-established rating structure. |
| |
|
|
| |
8. |
Tie breaking factors (4.3) are
taken into account when two coaches are tied after all factors
have been assessed. Some tie breaking factors are discretionary
and are applied on a common sense basis. The Selection Committee
should consider the tiebreakers in the following priority. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1) |
Gender: Female sport - Ontario's
representatives at the Nationals in the Junior and Belle divisions,
and Eastern Canada Championships in the Tween AA division must
have a fully certified Level 2 female head or assistant coach
on the bench. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
2) |
Daughter potentially on team
- non issue based on the caliber of the daughter. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
3) |
Gloucester-Cumberland resident
- promotion of our Association. |
| |
|
|
| |
9. |
The recommendations of the Selection
Committee are based on a majority position of the members of the
Committee. Every member has an equal voice |
| |
|
|
| |
10. |
All applications accepted by
the GCRA Executive must be considered by the Selection Committee.
However, the Selection Committee may not require each applicant
to undergo an interview. |
| |
|
|
| |
11. |
All members of the Selection
Committee must be in attendance for all interviews where possible.
If not available, the interview is rescheduled. |
| |
|
|
| |
12. |
The VP Competitive will apprise
candidates of the results only after the GCRA Executive approval
is received. |
| |
|
|
This Page Last revised
on the website: 13 October, 2005
|